Friday, January 4, 2013

Post-Pro-Life Reflections

Let me live
Let me walk into the sunshine
Let me live
Feel my mother's arms around me
Feel my father's love surround me
Be a part of God's creation
Let me live

 -Pat Boone, "Let Me Live"

Pro-Life propaganda is pretty effective on a little kid. Songs like the above, books such as Tilly, a plethora of miscellaneous bumper-sticker slogans, Last Days Newsletter articles, and Pro-Life magazines, combined with the traumatizing Pro-Life trump card of dismembered-fetus pictures, had me convinced that abortion was the number-one atrocity facing America. Perhaps it was even the worst atrocity of all time. These materials were peppered with blame: Feminists, Democrats, and money-hungry abortion "doctors" (always in quotes) were frequent targets. Interestingly, the most blame was assigned to Christians who didn't care enough: you had better vote Pro-Life, picket, lay down in front of abortion clinics. If you don't, abortion is your fault.

What was a child to do, now convinced that babies were being ripped apart, in agonizing pain, and that she was to blame? I wasn't entirely sure. I went out of my comfort zone a time or two for picketing, or candlelight vigils in sub-zero January. I made myself look at the aborted fetus pictures on a regular basis, and when I wasn't doing that, I would lose myself in nightmarish daydreams in which bloody aborted fetus parts would be dumped over my body as punishment for my inaction. Mostly I just cried.

It was only this past year that I realized, really realized, that the hullabaloo was all for nothing. At long last it has sunk in for me that a fetus doesn't care if it's being aborted. And for someone who had been taught that fetuses writhe in agony and make silent screams when they're aborted, that changes everything.

Abortion is not really cruel


Although there is scientific uncertainty as to when a fetus starts to feel pain response, the ages in dispute are between 20 and 35 weeks gestational age. Additionally, it's worth considering that a fetus's brain is awash in chemicals that basically keep it in a state of sleepiness/drowsiness. It's "knocked out," so to speak. Meanwhile, in the U.S., only 1.5 percent of all abortions performed are in this 21+ week range when a fetus's pain response starts to develop in a significant way. Generally, third-trimester abortions are only performed in cases of medical necessity such as when the life of the mother is threatened or the fetus has a severe deformity. You know, the reasons Pro-Lifers are most likely to make exceptions for?

Therefore, in the vast majority of, if not all, cases, abortion cannot be considered "cruel" no matter what method is used to end the fetus's life.

If, as some would point out, the point of the Pro-Life movement is to oppose abortion because of an ethic of preserving human life for the sake of it, irrelevant of cruelty issues, what was the point of brainwashing me into thinking that abortion is barbaric?

I'll tell you why.

The first reason, I suppose, must be simple misunderstanding. A pro-lifer reads "Embryonic brain development begins at 3 weeks" and hears "At 3 weeks, an embryo can think." A Pro-Lifer looks at a dismembered embryo or fetus and thinks "That looks like a miniature infant. It must be able to hurt like an infant can." This kind of skewed thinking borders on dishonesty when Pro-Lifers distribute fetus models that make an embryo look a lot more like an infant than it actually does, or when they attribute the characteristics of infants, or even toddlers or teenagers to a fetus (more on that later).

Second, I believe that for some Pro-Lifers, aborted fetus pictures are a type of torture porn. It was for me in some ways. While traumatizing, looking at pictures of dismembered fetuses also came with a kind of visceral thrill and fascination, much the same way a child might enjoy dissecting a dead squirrel. Christians, who helm the Pro-Life movement, have long had an affinity for the grisly; why do you think Foxe's Book of Martyrs was so popular, or why The Passion of the Christ was such a hit? Certainly not for the spiritual enrichment. The Pro-Life articles I read often seemed to take a certain relish in describing how atrociously horrible abortion is. I don't think this reveals an unusually twisted psyche in the Pro-Lifers, it's just human psychology.

Third, it stokes ordinary Pro-Life self-righteousness into a frenzy. The more you play up how evil you think the position of Pro-Choice people is, the better you get to feel about yourself. It inoculates you against considering other positions. They're evil baby killers who like to cruelly rip apart little ones. We're the ones who want to protect babies.

The fetus as a tool


The lines at the top of this post are from a song called "Let Me Live" by Pat Boone, a Christian singer who is surely aware that fetuses are incapable of communicating with their mothers, but apparently found the notion compelling enough to write a song about. This song is the perfect emblem of a manipulative tactic in the Pro-Life arsenal: giving a voice to the fetus.

Putting aside the fact that there's no way a fetus can have anything resembling an actual thought until the cerebral cortex is developed (about 20 weeks), it's interesting that Pro-Lifers feel comfortable putting their opinions into the mouth of an embryo. It's not surprising, though; for the often-religious Pro-Lifers, God is a sockpuppet, so why not add fetuses to the show?

The typical fetus narrative goes something like this: "Mommy, let me live. I want to be part of the world and run and play on a swingset. I have fingernails and bones and all I want is the chance to live."
But why not a different viewpoint?
"Wow, Mom, my existence seems to be causing you a predicament. If you had me, you'd have trouble paying rent and taking care of my brother and sister. It's really unfair of me to demand that you go through the miseries of pregnancy and childbirth to have me; you are not my slave. Since I won't be able to feel it anyway, you can go ahead and abort me."
If you're going to anthropomorphize a fetus into an adult, why not a selfless one who cares more about its mother's well-being than its own eventual life? Pro-Lifers assume fetuses are theirs to speak for, when they can't even be assed to accurately understand or portray the cognitive capacity of the thing they're trying to defend. And they peddle a simplistic view of motherhood, too.

This sympathy with the fetus comes up a lot in the mind games and supposedly unanswerable questions Pro-lifers come up with, like that old chestnut, What if you had been aborted? The simple answer to that is that I wouldn't be "me." I would have no concept of self. I wouldn't care. If my mom had rolled over and gone to sleep instead of having sex with my dad, I also wouldn't be around, but I don't consider it some kind of moral threat for people not to have sex. My being aborted would be no different from non-existence, except that my developing presence would have been a slight inconvenience to my mother in the former case. What happened to me before I had the ability to think is of no concern to me.

An embryo or fetus does not care if it's aborted because it's physically unable to "care" about anything.

If you want to have some personal ethic of the sanctity of life, fine. Be my guest. You can be a vegetarian if you wish. You can oppose killing shrimp, or cutting down trees. You can be a Jain and avoid eating root vegetables, and carry a little broom to sweep away bugs from your path so you don't step on them. I don't care. Just quit trying to guilt-trip children, quit worshiping fetuses to puff up your own sense of self-righteousness, and stop trying to legislate protections for something that is less sentient than a fish. Doing those things, at the expense of women's liberty and the truth, causes more harm than a fetus has ever cared about. I'm so glad to be rid of your bullshit.

9 comments:

  1. Thank you for sharing. I believe even if an unborn child cannot feel pain (as you espouse) it still deserves to live. They are innocent and should not be killed because they are inconvenient etc. I believe the time for persons to choose is when they decide to be sexually active. That is a choice they are making.Abortion involves another life. I believe strongly in rights for the unborn. I am one who chooses to be a voice for they that have no voice.
    In closing, I want to encourage you with what God thinks about YOU...

    "He says He rejoices over you with singing." Zeph. 3:17
    He is in love with you and is calling you back to himself.
    "He loves you with an everlasting love!" Jer. 31:3

    ...An unseen friend who cares

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for commenting.

      Learning the fact that embryos can't feel pain was shocking to my pro-life views not because that was my primary intellectual objection to abortion, but it was the most significant emotional one. The fact that pro-lifers make basically no effort to spread correct information about this, and mislead people into thinking the embryos of the age most commonly aborted can feel what's happening to them is a serious blow against their credibility.

      The ultimate reason why I don't care about first-trimester abortions (which is most of them) is that embryos are too neurologically undeveloped to have experiences. They can't think, they don't know what's happening to them when they are killed, and they do not suffer. If something has no capacity to suffer or be aware of what's happening to it, I don't see how it even exists on a moral axis. It is not much different to me than killing a plant or a sponge or a bacterium or some other life-form that doesn't really think or feel. "Innocent" is an emotionally loaded buzzword that don't even apply.

      Why should I believe that the words of the Bible are "what God thinks of me" and not just words that some humans wrote?

      Delete
  2. Hello!

    Is it possible you have had an abortion? Many woman who have had an abortion deal with PTSD. Often it takes years to come to the surface. Something will trigger it...a certain date, seeing another child that would be the same age as the aborted child, etc. Many women regret their decision and struggle greatly with guilt, depression, problems with relationships and more. If this is you, there are many resources available. One would be a book "Her choice to Heal." by Sydna Masse.

    Regarding the statements I made about how I believe God sees you. One must believe the bible to be true in order to engage in any encouragement that could come from it. It sounds like you are not at that point. Could it be some Christians have let you down and maybe been hypocrites, or unloving towards you ? I believe one day you and I will meet with God. We will be responsible for how we chose to relate (or not relate) to Him. The challenge for all is to not relate to God based on how other Christians have treated us. I challenge you to consider the possibility that God created you. He loves you very much and longs to connect with you. But, He is not pushy. He is calling out to you, but you get to choose to respond or not.

    Very sincerely, R. Gayle

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I haven't had an abortion, I'm not sure what led you to think that? Even if I had, I don't know why you would think it would traumatize me. There is no well-established link between abortion and mental health problems.

      My lack of belief in the Bible's divinity (which is what I'm guessing you mean by its "truth") has nothing to do with the bad behavior of Christians. Judging by the books' content and cultural context, it seems to me like exactly what we'd expect to find in a book written by flawed, myopic-thinking humans. It does not seem to me like a book that contains the sort of information we'd expect to get from a superpowered, benevolent being as claimed.

      I have considered the possibility that a god created mankind, and I believed so for a long time, but I don't think that's where the evidence points. There's no version of theism I can accept without something factual to hinge it all on. Otherwise I'm just making things up, or blindly accepting the things others have made up. I have no interest in believing in made-up things.

      Delete
  3. Hello!

    It seems you have spent a lot of time reading and studying to come to your belief system. That is all well and good, but..
    what if you are wrong and the bible is true? You are risking so much. I am concerned for you but respect that it this time we are clearly not on the same page in our beliefs.

    Thank you for the opportunity to converse in a respectful manner.

    All the best, R. Gayle

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By the same token, someone could tell me "Aren't you risking a lot by rejecting Islam?" or any other religion that claims that only its followers are on the true path. Even various Christian sects have different ideas of what must be believed, so no matter what route I take, someone out there thinks I'm betting wrong. It really does not concern me. I'm only concerned about the truth and I do not find any theistic beliefs to be true.

      Thank you for the respectful conversation as well.

      Delete
  4. You invoke many valid points, assuming there is no god. What I struggle with however, is the vast difference between humans and other animals, albeit while I also acknowledge our many similarities. Our differences seem to set us apart.
    Certainly, the awareness of pain casts an impression of undeniable barbarism; ie: causing excruciating lethal trauma to a small and innocent baby on account of two people not having the willpower to abstain from an act whose oft natural consequence is life (except for in the cases of rape of course referring to the "willpower" verbage). This is an image with provokes much pathos and is a very different picture than the responsible couple who just wasn't "ready" to take on the burden of life, which when they ended it was on average, between 6 and 11 wks (between the size of a lentil and a fig, quite small for sure).
    But then again, what about that vast difference between ourselves and other animals? We're able to express love in ways other animals cannot, able to more complexly communicate in ways other animals cannot, able to have an awareness of an eschatological existence like other animals cannot (though, I'd be hard-pressed to "prove" this; being an animal keeper my entire life, this is my unstudied impression. I've never heard of animals worshiping other gods...), and being able to abstain from sexual impulses in a way most other animals cannot (ex. stallions must be separated from mares, otherwise....while 29 year-old men can walk 5th avenue, siting a host of sexual entices and is able to withhold from his impulses...although, this is not to say such control is exhibited by every 29-year-old male, hopefully, you get my point. This is also not to suggest animals don't love, communicate, and abstain, as you and I both know they do.
    So what of these differences? Are we assuming authority upon ourselves that we perhaps shouldn't have? It is my personal belief, God or not, though, it's tough to take God (Allah or Christ...) out of the equation entirely, we walk a dangerous road when we begin to point and say, "while this here human life is too small to matter (at six weeks in-womb a baby has her ears, nose, and mouth markings set and has a heartbeat), or this baby here is too stupid to matter, or this one is too ugly to matter. It starts getting a little "Orwellian" and "Huxleyesque" in my eyes. I'm not sure we're meant to have that authority. But that's my two-cents.

    Also, to your comment stating that there is no connection between abortion and mental illness: I am aware of a post-abortion support group in my hometown, and the oldest member is 70+ years old. This group is not full of "churched" women who have been strong-armed into carrying the "burden of murder." In fact, to my knowledge, none of the attendees are "churched." They are all different ages, from different demographics, who all sought this group from grieving on their own and share the same anguish of past choices. So whether there is a correlation to "mental illness" or not, there is certainly groves of anecdotal evidence exemplifying years of emotional trauma. I'd be interested to keep chatting! Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your point is definitely taken that humans (assuming they're at an age of reason, not intoxicated, etc) can decide not to have sex. I don't buy the common narrative of "Oh, we didn't mean to have sex. It just happened." It's just... I have to laugh at that. Maybe for some people sex is like that but I highly doubt it.

      Your third paragraph is interesting to me because that's exactly why I do divide a line between the zygote/embryo/early fetus and an adult human, or even an infant. At those early ages of development, a Z/E/F doesn't have the capability to think like an older human can. A Z/E/F doesn't love, reason, or have much of an awareness of anything. That's why its life is basically trivial in my view: it's not a moral agent because there's no moral or immoral way to treat something that can't consciously experience anything. Which is why I feel strongly that the ability of people to seek sexual satisfaction and happiness with their partner trumps a Z/E/F's right to live. The think/can't think divide is hardly a cosmetic difference, after all.

      Maybe I wasn't clear enough in my comment what I meant by saying there's no link between abortion and mental health problems. Of course there are some women who regret their abortion or feel grief over it or had a very bad reaction to it. But it doesn't make sense to just assume that someone who had an abortion is probably traumatized from it, since statistically speaking, there's no evidence that voluntary abortion is any more likely to cause ongoing depression or anxiety than, say, giving birth does.

      Thank you for your thoughts as well.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete